Remove the Risk From Hiring by Reverse-Engineering Your 'A-Players'

Remove the Risk From Hiring by Reverse-Engineering Your 'A-Players'
Previous

Reverse-engineer your hiring process. Here's how.

Hiring by intuition goes awry 75 percent of the time.

So suggests research conducted by talent consultant Brad Smart. Smart, whose clients include Citigroup, Salesforce, and Siemens, advocates using hard data instead of gut feelings when selecting employees. The key, he tells ERE Media, is to unlock the source code that powers your company’s “A-players” — the top 10 percent of performers in any given field or position who produce up to 10 times that of other employees — and then use it to build an evidence-based hiring scorecard.

Here is Smart’s six-step process for reverse-engineering your A-players’ success into well-defined, objective hiring metrics that enable strategic recruiting decisions.

1. Drill down into the DNA of success.

“Evaluate the characteristics of top performers already in your company, since those traits are likely to be predictors of success in that job,” Smart says. Ask: Who are the organization’s most successful employees? Why? Are they successful because they hit deadlines or because they produce the highest-quality work? What skills — communication, collaboration, focus, etc. — are most critical to their success?

2. Create scorecards for each role.

Based on your findings in No. 1, clearly communicate what success looks like for every position in your company. Include goals and deliverables, as well as interpersonal skills, in what Smart calls a “talent profile.”

3. Build your virtual bench of A-players.

Begin recruiting for your future hiring needs “using forward-looking business plans and strategic directions, as well as a view of how the culture will need to look in the future,” Smart says. “These talent profiles can then be embedded into job/role descriptions, to ensure that they account for both current and future success requirements.”

4. Screen candidates over the phone.

Ask each candidate these four questions: What are your career goals? What are you really good at professionally? What are you not good at or not interested in doing? What would each of your last five bosses list as your greatest strengths and weaknesses? “When candidates tell you the  rating  their past bosses would’ve given them, something fascinating happens,” writes leadership columnist Christine Comaford in Bloomberg Businessweek. “They either reveal their arrogance, or they reveal their humility. I have a follow-up question, which is, ‘What would you have had to do to have gotten a score of five?’ This further reveals any disdain for authority, exposes a difficult working environment, or some other potentially useful nuggets.”

5. Conduct tandem “topgrading” interviews.

Begin by asking about the requirements, accomplishments, and mistakes of the candidate’s past jobs. Delve deeper into the team surrounding each candidate by asking, What was the caliber of the employees you inherited (A’s, potential A’s, and non-A’s)? What changes did you make to the talent mix? How would your direct reports rate you on a scale of one to five? Why did you leave? “Remember, we all need to manage up, manage down, manage across,” Comaford writes. “Everyone can stand some improvement at one of the levels. Find out from your candidate where he or she needs help in advance.”

6. Ask the candidate to coordinate reference-check phone calls.

During your conversations with references, request examples of the candidate’s strengths and weaknesses, ratings of the candidate’s overall performance, and details about any weaknesses identified by the candidate. “At every step in the hiring process, remind candidates that before receiving a job offer from your organization, a final step is for them (the candidate) to arrange reference calls with former bosses and others that you select,” Smart blogs at Topgrading.com. “It’s a powerful ‘truth serum.”

 

Article provided by thebuildnetwork.com   © 2013 Mansueto Ventures LLC

Next

On a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 being 'Not Good' and 5 being 'Excellent', how would you rate this article?

Press enter to submit your rating

Rate this Article

Use this form to provide additional feedback based on the rating you provided.

Thanks for Rating

Would you like to provide feedback?

Thanks for your feedback!

The information, views, opinions, and positions expressed by the author(s) and/or presented in the article are those of the author or individual who made the statement and do not necessarily reflect the policies, views, opinions, and positions of Regions. Regions makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, suitability, or validity of any information presented.

This information is general in nature and is provided for educational purposes only. Information provided and statements made by employees of Regions should not be relied on or interpreted as accounting, financial planning, investment, legal, or tax advice. Regions encourages you to consult a professional for advice applicable to your specific situation.